> Engineers report shifting toward higher-level work managing AI systems and report significant productivity gains. However, these changes also raise questions about the long-term trajectory of software engineering as a profession.
I’m surprised employees are this open to their employer about these details of their job.
I am curious : could GenAI have written the paper "Attention is all you need"? We were trapped in CNN RNN architectures for a while : could genAi have arrived at a better architecture ?
> Engineers report shifting toward higher-level work managing AI systems and report significant productivity gains. However, these changes also raise questions about the long-term trajectory of software engineering as a profession.
I’m surprised employees are this open to their employer about these details of their job.
Why would you report honestly to your employer about metrics and methodologies that could potentially show you're not needed?
They are still needed though - the code isn't just prompted into thin air by nobody.
I am curious : could GenAI have written the paper "Attention is all you need"? We were trapped in CNN RNN architectures for a while : could genAi have arrived at a better architecture ?
Most believable stats out there.
/s